Comments on: Crushing Strength https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/ WOOD Thu, 20 Nov 2025 19:13:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Michelle https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-33658 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 19:13:13 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-33658 In reply to David Michael Fink.

They used the hydraulic force of water.

]]>
By: Eric https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-28517 Thu, 19 Jun 2025 02:19:52 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-28517 In reply to Josh hinze.

Sorting through the data, it appears that Licaria canella (Kaneelhart) has the best crushing strength to weight ratio. (Although bamboo also ranks very high, but I tend to discount this as bamboo has so much variation between species, and the data is very patchwork and can be taken from such a wide variety of species that it may be that we end up linking the strength of one species with the weight of another, etc.)

]]>
By: Josh hinze https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-28514 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 23:08:10 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-28514 I would like to know what specis has the best weight to crushing strength ratio?

]]>
By: David Michael Fink https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-22079 Thu, 09 May 2024 16:10:02 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-22079 So much for Egyptians using wooden sleighs to move stone. The weight of the Unfinished Obelisk is over 20 million pounds. Wood vaporizes underneath such forces and moments.

]]>
By: Eric https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-18712 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 21:40:35 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-18712 In reply to Anthony Faulds.

You’re right about the USDA links, they recently changed their link structure so I’ve had to update all the links, but overlooked links in the comments. It should be updated to work now.

]]>
By: Anthony Faulds https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-18701 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:57:59 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-18701 In reply to Eric.

Hello Eric, I would like to delve further into this, as per Gregory’s enquiry ut for entirely different reason…. I have started making laminated longbows and looking into what woods are best suited. I have read your piece on this subject and fascinated by the “Bow Index” you produce relating MoR with MoE. However, as pertinent as this is it is not the whole story.

The inner laminate, facing the archer (belly), is subject to compression. The centre laminate (spine) merely flexes but the outer laminate (back) is under tension.

Woods ideally suited to spine include Purpleheart from S. America or Padauk from Africa.
Woods for backing known for their extreme tensile strength include hickory, bamboo.
Belly woods include lemonwood, osage orange, maple.

But I would like to explore what other generally available woods are also suitable, an understanding of compression strength and tensile strength as separate properties become important.

BTW, the link to the USDA wood handbook no longer works. Perhaps the Web address has been changed?

Kind regards.

]]>
By: ted https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-17351 Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:10:30 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-17351 I was looking for other issues that led my to the crushing/compression strength(parallel) but landing here did get me the link to :Mechanical Properties of Wood
David E. Kretschmann, Research General Engineer
I have a lot to research for what I want to find out which is requirement on many fronts. I know you are busy person but I’d like to run an idea by if you have the time on the combination of aspects/specifications I’d like to find in a wood to make a staff type combat weapon.

]]>
By: giorgyS https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-11223 Sat, 22 Aug 2020 19:53:36 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-11223 In reply to Gregory Curtis Holmberg.

Be aware that the speed of sound along and perpendicular to the grain both affect the performance of a guitar top. So strength is only a small part of the story.
Fot example, this is the reason that the grain of the wood runs along the long dimension of the guitar.

]]>
By: Eric https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-7790 Sat, 18 May 2019 15:49:35 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-7790 In reply to Gregory Curtis Holmberg.

Can’t address all your questions, but the USDA wood handbook has more in-depth information on select species of woods, sitka spruce being one of them. https://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf

]]>
By: Gregory Curtis Holmberg https://www.wood-database.com/crushing-strength/comment-page-1/#comment-7788 Sat, 18 May 2019 03:10:34 +0000 http://www.wood-database.com/?page_id=9074#comment-7788 Where can I find numbers for wood strength in tension parallel to the grain? Crushing strength is about compression, and elasticity is about bending perpendicular to the grain, so not really what I want either.

I’m building a guitar and want to make a top from Sitka Spruce and another top from carbon fiber sheet, and compare them. I know Sitka Spruce tops on guitars are typicaly 1/8″ (3.2mm) with additional bracing. Elastic (flexure) modulus of Sitka Spruce is 11 GPa. But you don’t list the tensile strength of Sitka Spruce.

I need to figure out an equivalent thickness for the CF. For example, I know Toray T700S has a flexure modulus of 120 GPa and a tensile strength of 2860 MPa. https://www.toraycma.com/page.php?id=661

Any suggestions for calculating the thickness of a CF guitar top with flexure and tensile strength equivalent to a 1/8″ Sitka Spruce top?

]]>